<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Media Citizens - Interviews with social media influencers from around the world &#187; business model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smcitizens.com/tag/business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smcitizens.com</link>
	<description>Social Media, Influence, Consumer Behavior</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Challenging the old media business models (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.smcitizens.com/2010/01/18/challenging-the-old-media-business-models/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smcitizens.com/2010/01/18/challenging-the-old-media-business-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giedrius Ivanauskas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freemium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socia media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smcitizens.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just reading this great post by Robin Carey , the co-founder of Social Media Today, about the maturity of social media and the challenges it faces on the way. One of the main challenges for the businesses is monetization of social media. I completely agree with the thought that “Information does want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='dd_post_share dd_post_share_right'><div class='dd_buttons'><div class='dd_button'><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://www.smcitizens.com/2010/01/18/challenging-the-old-media-business-models/" data-count="vertical" data-text="Challenging the old media business models (Part 1)" data-via="smcitizens" ></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='dd_button'><a name='fb_share' type='box_count' share_url='http://www.smcitizens.com/2010/01/18/challenging-the-old-media-business-models/' href='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php'></a><script src='http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share' type='text/javascript'></script></div></div></div><p><a href="http://www.thebest3d.com/smart3d/Libra.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="social media" src="http://www.thebest3d.com/smart3d/Libra.jpg" alt="" width="443" height="368" /></a></p>
<p>I was just reading this great post by<a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/166881"> Robin Carey</a> , the co-founder of <a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/" target="_blank">Social Media Today,</a> about the maturity of social media and the challenges it faces on the way. One of the main challenges for the businesses is monetization of social media. I completely agree with the thought that <em>“Information does want to be free, free to move around at any rate, even if we’ll increasingly seeing value put on that information in various ways”, </em>and who can evaluate or put the value on the content best? The Consumer.<em> </em>The recent news about<em> </em><a href="http://mashable.com/2010/01/17/new-york-times-charge/" target="_blank"><em>News Corp</em></a> plans to monetize the content again, it kind of reminds me this video of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfH8Lrq2QdM&amp;feature=player_embedded"><em>Prosumer</em></a>, where corporations are trying to control the free movement of the content but at the end they loose the battle. Do not get me wrong I am not against paying for the content, but sometimes I don’t understand <strong>why can&#8217;t I pay for my favorite blogger or journalist directly? </strong>I think that’s about to change.<strong> I believe that “freemium” business model and payment systems will have to evolve to become more flexible and provide more choices for the consumer</strong>. <em>I can easily imagine the media platform (i.e.  Social Media Today) where I come to read the news and with a click of some sort of social &#8220;pay me&#8221; button I could pay for the good quality post and support my favorite blogger/journalist directly without any intermediaries by donating 10-50 p for the post. </em>The emergence of such function could massively improve the social media content quality as there would be kind of “natural selection” in social media because people would be motivated to build up their personal brands by creating valuable content (monetary motivation always helps). Furthermore, the media brands would be interested to attract good journalist/bloggers to maintain their brands who in return would be willing to share their revenue stream with the company because big brands attract more visitors. The more I think about the more clear it gets , that such kind of system could be a game changer and a win-win situation for everyone . What do you think about it?</p>
<div class='dd_post_share'><div class='dd_buttons'><div class='dd_button'><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smcitizens.com%2F2010%2F01%2F18%2Fchallenging-the-old-media-business-models%2F" send="false" show_faces="false"  layout="box_count" width="50"  ></fb:like></div></div><div style='clear:both'></div></div><!-- Social Buttons Generated by Digg Digg plugin v4.5.3.4, 
    Author : Yong Mook Kim
    Website : http://www.diggdigg2u.com -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smcitizens.com/2010/01/18/challenging-the-old-media-business-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

