Posts Tagged ‘Social Media’

Challenging the old media business models (Part 2)

January 27th, 2010

As a follow up to the recent post “Challenging the Old Media Business Models”  I want to get a bit deeper into the analysis of media business (revenue) models. There are quite a few them which come in different classifications and structures, but i find this diagram organized by Paul Bradshaw most suitable to discuss the subject, mainly because it is very clear, informative and well structured.

Most of these models like advertising, affiliates, premium (“velvet rope”) services have been tried and work pretty well under certain circumstance , but  “Social value” model hasn’t been explored that much or hasn’t been considered as a valuable enough on its own. According to Paul Bradshaw , “Social value” model revenue is generated through social interaction by brand community (in the form of donations, support or spin-off). Actually it is often dismissed as very mystified and unclear , because social value is quite difficult to measure. But the times are changing. I think with social media going mainstream, personal branding growing bigger and bigger and evolving monetary systems online  – “social value”  model can be the next big thing. I was thinking about it for a while and after short brainstorm came up with this:

free media business model

Consumer pays directly to author.

Social media is all about disintermediation. Therefore, it is is quite a straight forward model, but if developed it would present a real shift in consumer’s perception – paying for the content when you don’t have to ? Madness? No! It would be all about the social status and personal brand building!

It could be very attractive idea for bloggers who already have well established personal brands and maintain their own platforms. In order to implement this model the author would have to provide superior social platform where the relationship building with the community would have to be considered as main priority. According to Paul Bradshaw people never paid for ‘content’; they paid for a package and a service that included content – “They bought a newspaper (brand), not ‘the news.” In this case the newspaper would be a personal brand which would have to provide best social engagement possible. The personal branding  would have to work both ways – not only author would have to get paid for well developed brand and top content, but consumer would have to receive some social points back as well. Lets say consumer could leave his name and contact details on the contributors list or virtual good system could tweet automatically that a person just made a reward or donation. Also, this model could work really great in B2B environment as the parties are much more aware about mutual benefits of marketing and social interaction .

Consumer pays author – author pays media platform.

Author sharing revenue with the media company – basically paying money for the platform to speak (or to be heard).It may sound ridiculous, but this model could be very attractive for less established writers who has interesting ideas but have no strong background to support them or have no capabilities/resources to build their own platforms.

In order to implement this model the two conditions would have to be present – strong media brand and qualified but now well known writer. Young writers would be interested to have their material published on big platform for greater audience in return sharing their revenue with the media platform. Furthermore, the media platforms would be interested to maintain their brands and attract good journalist/bloggers because of advertising dollars they would bring – specialized and engaged communities created under big brand could be well targeted.

The outcome.

If these models are implemented the outcome would be quite dificult to predict. It’s clear though, that the personal branding and community building would gain major importance in the media strategy. The content would improve and there would be less “noise” in media in the long term, because of “natural selection” process.  The  big media brands could concentrate on their core capabilities managing the talents rather that content production itself. Who knows maybe one day we will have our X-Factor of media?  “In my dreams I have a plan If I got me a wealthy man I wouldn’t have to work at all, I’d fool around and have a ball”. – and that would be the song to sing for the audition, just the wealthy man would be the authors who bring wealth with the valuable content  and community. But most importantly consumer would get to be a king, it would be able to influence, participate and gain from the process .

So what do you think about it? Please share your thoughts whatever they may be and submit your answer to a quick poll:

Here is the list  of top articles and presentations analyzing the new media business models:

Making money from journalism: new media business models (by http://onlinejournalismblog.com)

What does the “Media Business Model” mean? (by http://www.longtail.com)

The Freemium Business Model: Anything There for the Media? (by http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com)

Social Media Citizens news: Facebook Now Growing by Over 700,000

July 3rd, 2009


“While Facebook has been growing at around 300,00 to 400,000 active users per day for most of the last three quarters, its growth rate seems to have again significantly increased in recent weeks to around 700,000 to 750,000 new users per day based on data we are tracking from Facebook’s advertising tools.” – http://www.insidefacebook.com/

Well that’s quite interesting news. It means that the growth is not slowing down for FB as a lot of people were predicting in the recent months. It seems that amazing Twitter growth had no impact on FB expansion plans. Way to go ! Here are some interesting stats from the report:

  • 30 million users update their statuses at least once each day (13 million did per month at the beginning of the year)
  • 8 million users become fans of Pages each day (up from 2.5 million per day at the beginning of the year)
  • 10 million videos are uploaded each month (up from 4 million)
  • 900 million photos are uploaded to the site each month (up from 700 million)
  • 1 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photos, etc.) are shared each week (up from 15 million per month)
  • 35 million active groups exist on the site (up from 19 million)
  • 2.5 million notes created each month
  • 30 million users access Facebook each month through a mobile device

Gen X + Gen Y = Social Media Citizens?

July 2nd, 2009

Recently I read quite a few posts identifying the differences between gen Y and gen X. I agree that there are some real differences between generations as such, even though I believe that it is not right assumption to target them as two completely different consumers’ groups, especially to do that on Social Media Properties. Why?

In my opinion these 2 generations are not that different and actually have quite a lot in common. So called “Digital natives”, “Millennials”, “Generation Y” represents tech-savvy, success driven, self-confident, independent but community-minded people, who according to Tapscott are quicker and more tolerant of diversity than their predecessors. Even though, they are not the only ones who understand the technology adapt well to the new mediums. Some of the “Digital immigrants” arguably might have even bigger influence on the on going changes in the market as they are aware about the changing situation and they have the power, knowledge and resources to influence this phenomenon.

That’s where the term of Social Media Citizens” comes in. It defines people united by the inspiration for sharing and engagement, for which the age difference is just another opportunity to learn from each other, not in fact to behave in some different way.

These eight norms identified by Tapscott just confirm my assumptions as most of the points are clearly relevant for Social Media Citizens from both generations:

  • They value freedom and choice in everything they do.
  • They love to customise and personalise.
  • They scrutinise everything.
  • They demand integrity and openness, including when deciding what to buy and where to work.
  • They want entertainment and play in their work and education, as well as their social life.
  • They love to collaborate.
  • They expect everything to happen fast.
  • They expect constant innovation.

Therefore, when planning SMO strategy marketers should really consider this target group, who are very likely to be the “evengalists” of the brands and not blindly follow the assumptions supported just by the age difference.

Marketing reports 2009

April 24th, 2009

Can’t believe that the first quater of the year is almost over! Anyways, as the time passes by it brings  some new insights  about our beloved social media and marketing. I have gatehered a few recent reports, which analyze changing social media environment and provide some intresting data  how credit crunh is affecting consumers attitudes towards brands. Enjoy !

P.S. If you have a link to other similar report please post it as the comment and i will update my list. Cheers !

Social media "Evangelists" are the saint! Not?

March 5th, 2009

The resent blog by Forrester research Sponsored Conversations: When it’s ok to pay bloggers to post” questions the legitimacy of social media enthusiast who become “brand evangelists”. The blogosphere itself created this name so it can follow its roots an answer this easy question (well, maybe not that easy). It is funny how many similarities you could find between the church preacher and social media enthusiast – both sharing their experience or the knowledge which is not easily accessible by other tribe members, and of course doing it for “Free”. Well, I believe by now everyone had to figure it out the sad true that there is nothing in this world for “Free”. Everyone is doing what their are doing with some intention – the church leader wants to become a Pope one day as a social media man wants to reach new highs in his environment, and well let be honest they are not doing it for “Free”. I have a good memory – every time being in the church i remember the men in black with the bowls secretly browsing through people asking for little donations. Well, they way I see it – everyone has to pay for the service, its completely normal and acceptable and the message send by the evangelist doesn’t become less important because I gave the money for it , especially knowing that the guy spend hours writing , figuring out  and creating the meaningful message, and the Time is Money, Isn’t It?. Having said that, I do understand that social media world works a bit different from the church and the message’s acceptance is affected by the reward, but I believe that it really depends from the nature of the reward (monetary or non –monetary ), the form of  the reward (sponsorship, wages and etc.) and relationship between “brand evangelist” and his/her community. Anyhow, speaking about the rewards my recent research (Social media effects on marketing communications) clearly identified that rewards don’t help to spread the message,

blogging-reasons

therefore, marketers should be concentrating on the quality and frequency of the content, rather than rewarding every single customer who speaks well about the company.

Who are we? or the story of Web 2.0 Citizens

March 2nd, 2009

Well, finally i found some time to upload my dissertation  online. In order not to bore you till death with one long document  i’ve decided to publish it in a few peaces most relevant to this blog. Today, I decided to share the part from the literature review  which actually made me to start writing this blog – the part which discusses  the People who are changing the world of communications (most of the time without knowing that though:). The concepts of postmodern  consumer have been analyzed for a while in the marketing literature, but the talks about digital natives,  brand communities , tribes and the changing means of communication  are taken to another level by arrival of Social Media and Web 2.0.  Blume’s quote just about sums it up for me :

“As powerful as it is technology is just enabler and it’s the technology in the hands of almost always connected people that make it so powerful”.

So if you are interested in the subject i think it could be quite valuable to read the rest of the  document on Scribd. Well , let me know if you read it and it would be greatly appreciated, to receive any kind of comments for the further analysis. Cheers!

[scribd id=12921319 key=key-coh3u2rwlzfqj8tr4sn]

P.S. The full copy of the dissertation you can find here

The Prosumer

July 11th, 2008

I just have to start my blog from this old good futuristic video.

[youtube=http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xj8ZadKgdC0]

More info about Web 2.0 Citizens – http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=18194952996